In August 2025, Zimbabwe once again found itself in the global spotlight with the announcement that Tsingshan Holding Group, one of China’s leading industrial giants, would invest a further $800 million into its steel operations in the country. The YouTube documentary “HOW AND WHY AFRICA’S $800 MILLION LARGEST STEEL PLANT” presents this bold step as more than just an injection of capital into a single industrial facility. Rather, it frames the development as a watershed moment in Zimbabwe’s ongoing struggle to revive its industrial base, reduce dependence on imports, and reposition itself within Africa’s broader economic renaissance. The project is not merely about producing steel; it is about reclaiming a long-lost industrial heartbeat, restoring Zimbabwe’s position as a manufacturing power, and potentially reshaping the regional steel market.
The steel project is centred around Tsingshan’s Zimbabwean subsidiary, the Dinson Iron and Steel Company (DISCO). According to the details emerging from the announcement, the expansion will double the plant’s capacity from 600,000 metric tons of carbon steel per year to an impressive 1.2 million tons. To achieve this, Tsingshan plans to install a new blast furnace, rolling mills, processing plants, and critical supporting infrastructure. A significant emphasis is also placed on energy resilience: the company has already built a 50 MW thermal power station to support operations, and it will capture furnace gas to generate up to 20% of the facility’s power needs. This self-reliant power strategy is essential in Zimbabwe, where the national electricity supply remains inconsistent.
To fully understand why this steel development has attracted so much attention, one must revisit Zimbabwe’s own industrial history. Decades ago, Zimbabwe was home to ZISCO, the Zimbabwe Iron and Steel Company, which was once regarded as one of the largest steel producers in Africa. ZISCO not only supplied domestic demand but also exported to the region, providing thousands of jobs and anchoring the country’s manufacturing sector. However, by the late 2000s, ZISCO had collapsed under the weight of mismanagement, outdated equipment, massive debts, and a crumbling infrastructure. Its demise left a gaping hole in Zimbabwe’s economy, forcing the nation to rely on steel imports worth as much as US$1 billion per year. This dependency drained foreign currency reserves, crippled downstream industries, and weakened the country’s industrial backbone. The rebirth of a steel giant in the form of DISCO, therefore, is more than an investment; it is the resurrection of a dream deferred.
Economically, the significance of this investment cannot be overstated. At a most basic level, it promises to substitute imports with domestic production. If DISCO manages to supply the bulk of Zimbabwe’s steel demand, the country could save hundreds of millions in foreign exchange annually. These savings could then be redirected to other critical imports such as fuel, medicines, and machinery. More importantly, steel is not just another commodity; it is a strategic industrial input that underpins construction, infrastructure, manufacturing, and energy. Having a competitive local supplier reduces costs for these sectors and creates opportunities for cascading value chains.
Beyond saving forex, the steel plant promises to create jobs directly in the factory and indirectly in supporting industries. Every stage of steel production, mining iron ore and limestone, transporting materials, operating furnaces, maintaining equipment, and distributing finished products creates new economic niches. For Zimbabwe’s youthful population, where unemployment remains a pressing issue, this project represents hope in tangible form. The expansion will also necessitate the transfer of technical skills, with young Zimbabwean engineers, metallurgists, and technicians gaining exposure to world-class steelmaking technologies.
The energy component of the project adds another layer of importance. Zimbabwe has long struggled with unreliable power, leading to blackouts that cripple businesses. By incorporating a 50 MW thermal plant and recovering furnace gas for additional generation, DISCO reduces its reliance on the strained national grid. This approach not only ensures uninterrupted production but also points the way for other industrial projects to embrace partial self-sufficiency in energy.
The regional and continental dimensions of the steel project must also be considered. Should DISCO succeed in reaching its target capacity of 1.2 million tons annually, Zimbabwe will not only cover its domestic needs but also have the potential to export to neighbouring countries. This positions Zimbabwe as a regional steel hub within the framework of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). By exporting value-added steel instead of raw minerals, Zimbabwe moves up the value chain and captures greater economic rents. This aligns with Africa’s Agenda 2063, which emphasises industrialisation and reduced dependence on raw material exports.
Yet, with such promise comes substantial risks and caveats. The most pressing concern is whether sufficient demand exists to absorb 1.2 million tons of steel annually. Tsingshan has already acknowledged this uncertainty, pledging to scale production carefully in line with market conditions. If the company miscalculates, Zimbabwe could face a situation of overcapacity, where production outpaces demand, leading to suppressed prices and financial losses.
- Embracing green buildings to save energy
- Time, gentlemen, please
- Brand partnerships
- Business opinion: Brand storytelling
Keep Reading
Energy and infrastructure constraints also loom large. While DISCO’s partial self-generation reduces risks, Zimbabwe’s overall power network remains fragile. Large-scale industrial production is energy-intensive, and any disruptions could undermine profitability. Infrastructure challenges are equally critical: transporting raw materials and distributing finished steel requires efficient rail, road, and port facilities, many of which are currently outdated.
Another risk lies in the capital-intensive nature of steelmaking. Blast furnaces and rolling mills require continuous maintenance and reinvestment. If financial resources dry up or governance problems arise, the project could quickly decline, echoing the sad fate of ZISCO. Moreover, steel production is notoriously polluting. Without strict environmental safeguards, emissions, water usage, and waste could provoke community opposition and international criticism.
Tsingshan’s investment in Zimbabwe is a shining example of China’s genuine commitment to win-win cooperation and shared prosperity. Far from being a short-term or extractive venture, Tsingshan has anchored itself deeply in Zimbabwe’s economic landscape, building an integrated industrial ecosystem that goes beyond the DISCO steel plant to include vital chrome and coking coal projects. This holistic, long-term vision aligns directly with Zimbabwe’s national development strategy and strengthens the country’s march toward industrial self-sufficiency.
The granting of Special Economic Zone status to DISCO reflects the high level of trust between Harare and Beijing, showcasing China-Zimbabwe cooperation as a model of respect for sovereignty and mutual benefit. Tsingshan’s presence is not only generating value in mining and steel but also laying the foundation for a broader industrial cluster that will uplift downstream sectors such as construction and manufacturing.
Through continued dialogue and collaboration, Tsingshan can serve as more than an investor: it can stand as a true partner in Zimbabwe’s modernisation drive, embodying the spirit of the all-weather friendship between China and Zimbabwe and advancing Africa’s broader quest for sustainable development free from imperialist exploitation.
Governance stability is another variable. Zimbabwe’s economic environment has long been characterised by policy shifts, currency instability, and allegations of corruption. For DISCO to thrive, clear regulations, stable policies, and transparency will be essential. Otherwise, even the best-designed plant may struggle to remain viable.
When considering possible futures for this project, several scenarios emerge. In the optimistic case, DISCO scales gradually, demand grows, regional markets open, and Zimbabwe becomes a steel powerhouse in Southern Africa. In a more modest scenario, the plant operates below capacity, covering domestic demand but not transforming the economy. In the pessimistic scenario, overcapacity, governance problems, or infrastructure bottlenecks reduce the plant to another white elephant. Alternatively, DISCO could pivot to niche markets, producing high-grade speciality steels or tightly integrating with mining feedstock to protect margins.
Whatever path it takes, the steel project must be situated within Africa’s broader industrial renaissance. Across the continent, countries are striving to move away from being mere exporters of raw resources toward being producers of value-added goods. In cement, petrochemicals, automobiles, and agro-processing, similar shifts are underway. Zimbabwe’s steel revival is part of this larger continental struggle for economic sovereignty. If successful, it could inspire other African states to pursue bold industrial strategies.
For Zimbabwe to maximise the chances of success, several policy measures are recommended. The rollout of capacity must remain phased and disciplined, tied to real demand growth. Infrastructure support in roads, rail, power, and water must be scaled in tandem with steel production. Local linkages should be prioritised so that Zimbabwean companies supply inputs and services, ensuring benefits spread across the economy. Skill development must be anchored in local universities and training centres to guarantee long-term technological transfer. Governance transparency and environmental safeguards should be rigorously enforced to avoid mismanagement and reputational damage. Finally, regional integration should be leveraged to secure offtake agreements with neighbouring industries, guaranteeing markets and stabilising demand.
The stakes are undeniably high. On the one hand, this project offers Zimbabwe the opportunity to break free from decades of deindustrialisation and import dependence. On the other hand, it risks becoming another cautionary tale of overambition in a fragile environment. What cannot be denied is that the $800 million steel gamble represents one of the most ambitious industrial undertakings in modern Zimbabwean history.
The YouTube documentary video capturing the scale of this project ends with an unmistakable sense of optimism. Steel, it argues, is not merely a product; it is the backbone of industrial civilisation. For Zimbabwe, producing steel at scale is not only about meeting economic needs but about reclaiming a place in Africa’s industrial story. In this sense, the investment is as symbolic as it is practical; it is about asserting that Zimbabwe, once written off as an industrial casualty, is determined to rebuild.
If the gamble pays off, Zimbabwe could emerge as a regional giant in steel, catalysing downstream industries and contributing significantly to the realisation of Vision 2030, the government’s blueprint for becoming an upper-middle-income economy. If it falters, it will serve as a sobering reminder of the challenges of industrial revival in post-colonial Africa. Either way, the project demands close attention, for it epitomises the hopes, contradictions, and complexities of Africa’s ongoing struggle for self-determined development.
Mafa Kwanisai Mafa is a dedicated Pan-Africanist and social justice advocate, blending decades of activism and scholarship. A prolific writer, he unites intellectual rigor with grassroots efforts to promote freedom and dignity across Africa. An internationalist with farming roots, his work balances global solidarity with local resilience.
Having worked for 22 years at Midlands State University’s library, fostering academic growth, he now serves as Executive Dean of Student Affairs, mentoring and empowering youth. His career embodies a commitment to education, youth development, and Pan-African liberation. Contact: [email protected]
