HomeOpinionWorld View: Has Brexit sparked UK-EU trade war?

World View: Has Brexit sparked UK-EU trade war?

By GWYNnE DYER

INTERNATIONAL treaties are serious business. A lot of time and effort goes into negotiating them and they become part of international law. It is very rare for a politician to say, only a couple of years after negotiating a treaty, that his country always felt it was “a little bit provisional and open to review”.

That was Lord David Frost, who is still described as Britain’s chief Brexit negotiator, two years after Brexit happened. (That is because he is still trying to renegotiate it.) At the time he called the Brexit treaty an “excellent deal”, and Prime Minister Boris Johnson hailed it as a “fantastic deal”, but that was before the 2019 election.

A new crisis is bubbling up now because the Northern Ireland part of the deal is falling apart. It could trigger a British trade war with the European Union and a return to real war in Northern Ireland, but the deal is falling apart mainly because the Conservative-led British government was lying when it agreed to it in 2019.

Johnson was new in office in 2019 and desperately needed to “get Brexit done”. Only then could he call an election and hope to win a majority in parliament. So he made an agreement with the EU on post-Brexit trade relations, especially regarding Northern Ireland, that fell far short of what his government actually wanted.

Dominic Cummings, who was Johnson’s right-hand man until he lost an internal power struggle a year ago, explained last week why he and a few allies got Johnson to sign a document they had no intention of honouring.

“We wriggled (through the negotiations with the EU) with the best option we could,” Cummings said, “and intended to get Johnson to ditch the bits we didn’t like after whacking (Labour Party leader Jeremy) Corbyn” in an early election.

And so it came to pass. The Conservatives buried Corbyn in a landslide in the December 2019 election and the UK finally left the EU in January 2020 — or rather, most of it did. The “bits we did not like” mostly had to do with Northern Ireland which, for customs purposes, remained in the EU. Why?

The “Troubles” between the Loyalists (Protestants who wanted to stay in the UK) and the Nationalists (Catholics who wanted to make Northern Ireland part of the Irish republic) killed around 3 500 people in 1969-1998. Preserving the “Good Friday” agreement that ended the killing was vital, but it was not easy.

When the agreement was signed, both the UK and the Irish Republic were members of the EU, so the border between them could be opened: no check-points, no movement controls, no customs duties. That allowed Nationalists to come and go as they wished and think of themselves as Irish citizens, while Loyalists could go on believing they lived in the UK. Unfortunately, Brexit required creating a real customs frontier between the UK and the EU. Since a “hard” border on land would undermine the faith of Northern Irish Nationalists in the Good Friday deal and probably start the war again, London reluctantly agreed to put the border “in the Irish Sea” instead.

There would continue to be complete freedom of movement for people and goods throughout Ireland, while goods coming into Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK would go through EU customs checks at the Northern Irish ports.

It was a cumbersome solution that most Brexiteers hated because it infringed on British “sovereignty”, but Johnson was in a hurry so he signed. He then went around promising everyone in Northern Ireland that there would never be customs checks on goods passing between there and the rest of the UK. Was he lying, or had he simply not read the treaty properly?

Cummings claims that Johnson never understood what the deal he signed meant. But Johnson is not nearly as stupid as he pretends and most EU governments believe that he knowingly signed in bad faith.

Which brings us to the present! There have been serious delays in the way the customs controls work in the Northern Irish ports and the EU has just offered to exempt about half the affected food and medicines from all checks.

That was an olive branch, but Johnson just raised a new demand: that the European Court of Justice no longer have jurisdiction over possible violations of the treaty. And Lord Frost has threatened to “suspend” the treaty entirely if the EU does not give in.

EU authorities suspect that Johnson is seeking an excuse to blow up the treaty so that he can scapegoat the Europeans for the ensuing trade war and renewed war in Northern Ireland. Matters are getting worse in the UK on a number of fronts and he needs a distraction.

Would he really do that? He probably does not know yet himself.

  • Dyer is a London-based independent journalist. His new book is titled The Shortest History of War.

Recent Posts

Stories you will enjoy

Recommended reading