How well is your country governed? This is the question the Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) seeks to answer. This year’s results are bad news for the continent as a whole, and South Africa specifically. But what’s going right in Zimbabwe?
Sudanese billionaire Mo Ibrahim believes most of Africa’s problems are rooted in poor governance, and there are few who would disagree with him. He also believes that governance can and should be measured, accurately and objectively and that critiques and policy should be based on numbers rather than conjecture. To this end, he created the IIAG, which is now in its ninth iteration.
The 2015 edition — which includes South Sudan for the first time, as there is now enough data for Africa’s newest country — reveals a continent in governance limbo, with no overall improvement or decline. This headline statistic masks plenty of activity at country and category level, however — some of it surprising. We have trawled through the data to find the most interesting trends.
African governance is stagnating
This is the major takeaway from this year’s results.
“The results of the 2015 IIAG reveal that overall governance progress in Africa is stalling. Improvements in (index categories) participation and human rights and in human development are outweighed by deteriorations in safety and rule of law and sustainable economic opportunity,” said Ibrahim.
Should we be concerned? Absolutely. The Mo Ibrahim Foundation is desperate not to reinforce negative stereotypes of Africa, which makes this a particularly painful admission — there are few stereotypes more prevalent than that of poor African leadership and this data will prove many an Afro-pessimist’s point.
Which is why Ibrahim is at pains to stress that this overall trend does not tell the whole story.
“Africa is not a country. The scores and trends seen in the 54 individual countries on the continent are diverse, each showing specific patterns in their own right, along a wide range of results, with more than a 70-point gap between the top-ranking country, Mauritius, and the bottom-ranking country, Somalia,” he said.
The star performers
Over the last four years, only six countries improved across all four Ibrahim Index categories. These star performers are Cote d’Ivoire, Morocco, Rwanda, Senegal, Somalia and Zimbabwe.
An interesting mix which includes democracies, dictatorships, a monarchy and a conflict zone — in other words, no matter what the ideologues may tell you, there are several different formulas for better governance in Africa.
Côte d’Ivoire deserves a special mention, showing by far the greatest overall improvement. Credit for this must go to President Alassane Ouattara’s government, who have done a decent job of imposing stability following the 2010-2011 political crisis.
What’s going right in Zim?
It’s hard to ignore Zimbabwe’s presence in the top six improvers. In fact, it has shown the second largest overall governance improvement since 2011 — an uncomfortable statistic for President Robert Mugabe’s many critics, and one which will no doubt be trumpeted on the front pages of state media.
Drill down a little further and the data is even more puzzling. Zimbabwe’s biggest category-level improvement came in participation and human rights, with strong showings in the sub-categories of rights and gender. The country also did well in national security, personal safety, public management and infrastructure, welfare and health (it helps, of course, that the country is coming from such a low base).
For the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, results like these are potentially embarrassing, but also demonstrate the utility of the Ibrahim index: like it or not, some things have improved in Zimbabwe over the last few years, probably as a result of increased political stability and here are the numbers to prove it.
SA papers over the cracks
South Africa is the fourth-best-governed country in Africa, behind only Mauritius, Cape Verde and Botswana. The good news is that it has maintained that position for years and is even showing small signs of overall improvement (up 0,9 points since 2011, although this is well within the margin of error).
But the devil is in the details. Its high ranking conceals some concerning trends at sub-category level, in particular its exceptionally poor performance in personal safety and national security. For its citizens, South Africa is still an unacceptably dangerous country.
More surprising is the deterioration in the participation and human rights category, driven by declines in the gender and rights sub-categories. Specific indicators showing significant declines include freedom of association and assembly, freedom of expression and legislation on violence against women.
While these have yet to affect South Africa’s overall governance performance, it’s clear that these declines are the canaries in the coal mine — and should provide further evidence, if any was needed, that all is not well in the Rainbow Nation.
Banks and customs
Across the Ibrahim index’s 93 indicators, the two showing the biggest decline over the last four years are soundness of banks (-11 points) and customs procedures (-9 points). These are both concerning.
Reliable financial institutions are the foundation of any growing economy — if people are losing trust in African banks, then sustainable economic growth is more remote than ever.
Efficient customs, meanwhile, is absolutely essential for trade across African borders. The African Union thinks intra-African trade is fundamental to Africa’s economic future, and it’s not a good sign that, despite the continental body’s efforts, customs procedures are getting worse instead of better.
The biggest losers
No surprises that the biggest declines in governance in the last few years come from war zones. South Sudan, the Central African Republic and Mali fare particularly poorly. The lesson here is crushingly obvious, but is worth repeating anyway: conflict remains the biggest impediment to good governance in Africa.-Daily Maverick