HomePoliticsUZ Law faculty slams Chinamasa

Security forces intensify Mugabe poll campaign

THE Law faculty at the University of Zimbabwe yesterday attacked Justice minister Patrick Chinamasa for making ridiculous claims that they are producing half-baked lawyers.

Chinamasa last week criticised the Law faculty for producing what he called “half baked lawyers who were denting the reputation of the country’s legal fraternity”.

In his submission to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Justice, Legal, Constitutional and Parliamentary Affairs, the minister accused the lecturing staff of engaging in politics describing the quality of product as “dismal”.

In a hard-hitting response, the Dean of the Law Faculty, Emmanuel Magade, said the claims by Chinamasa came as “a bolt from the blue” and were “ridiculous”.

“We categorically refute the minister’s claims. In fact we wonder where it is coming from because over the years we have produced lawyers who have represented the country very well, locally, regionally and internationally,” he said. “We still have some of the staff who taught even the minister himself and our students have won the overall best team in regional competitions. This indicates that we are the best faculty in Africa.”

Magade was referring to a team that won the Moot Court competition that involved 14 universities from all over the continent in 2007 and 2009 respectively and two students working at the International Tribunal for Rwanda in Arusha and others working at The Hague.

“Instead of the brick-bats we are getting from the minister, we are supposed to be getting Oscars for our efforts. I am not sure where he is getting the half-baked lawyers he is talking about,” he said. “While it is possible that he might have worked with incompetent individuals within his ministry, it doesn’t mean all are like that. We have highly respected lawyers in the legislature, executive and across the political board who are products of this institution.”

The Law faculty has over the years turned out individuals who have grown to be human rights defenders and have in many cases clashed with Chinamasa over the country’s poor justice delivery system.

Magade said that Chinamasa’s claims on the faculty producing politicians instead of lawyers were “ridiculous”.

“It is absolutely ridiculous to allege that the faculty teaches politics to its students instead of law. We have never deviated from our primary mandate of training highly qualified lawyers,” he said. “However, as he (Chinamasa) might be aware, certain subjects and topics within every law school must necessarily be taught within particular social and political contexts”.

Magade said they taught their students to analyse whether the law is working satisfactorily and encourage them to check whether there are gaps or deficits in the law and if they are in need of reform.

 

Moses Matenga

Recent Posts

Stories you will enjoy

Recommended reading