HomeCommentTriumphant Buhari faces mammoth task

Triumphant Buhari faces mammoth task

“I THINK, once a dictator, always a dictator,” said Sonnie Ekwowusi, a columnist for Nigeria’s This Day newspaper. “Many people are afraid that if (Muhammadu Buhari) wins, they will go to prison.”

Gwynne Dyer

Well, Buhari did win the presidential election, and there are many people in Nigeria who really should go to prison, mainly for corruption while in political office. Quite a lot of them worked with or for the outgoing president, Goodluck Jonathan, whose six years in office were marked by corruption that was impressive even by Nigeria’s demanding standards.

The problem is that the last time Buhari was president, in 1984-85, he was a general who seized the office in a military coup and jailed not only the elected president, Shehu Shagari, but some 500 politicians, officials and businesspeople. Many of them undoubtedly deserved it, but legal norms were not observed. And many other people whose only offence was criticising Buhari (like famed musician Fela Kuti) also ended up behind bars.

That President Buhari, now 30 years in the past, was single-minded in his anti-corruption drive, but also somewhat simple-minded. At the petty end of the spectrum, civil servants who short-changed the government by showing up late for work were forced to do frog hops.

At the other end, he ordered the abduction of Shagari’s former adviser, Umaru Dikko, who was found drugged in a shipping crate at London’s Stansted airport.

Buhari was the loosest of loose cannons, and his own military colleagues overthrew him after 20 months of arbitrary mayhem.

But once democracy returned to Nigeria in 1999, Buhari started running for president as a born-again democrat. Now, on his fourth try, he has won, and by a safe margin: 15 million votes to Jonathan’s 12,5 million. It’s a typically low Nigerian turnout — around a third of eligible voters — but it is nevertheless a famous victory.

It’s the first time in half a century of Nigerian independence one elected president has handed over power to another after losing an election. Full credit to Jonathan for that: unusual for Nigeria, he didn’t dispute the outcome of the election.

But there is still a large question mark over his successor. Partly it is a question whether the leopard can change his spots. Buhari claims to have changed a great deal in 30 years, and has apologised for his past behaviour in power, but doubts linger. Partly it is a question of whether anybody can rule Nigeria successfully. The country has three major problems that cannot be solved in the short term.

The population, now 182 million, is growing at five million a year, and the birth rate has not dropped at all in the past 10 years. Nigeria will overtake the United States in population by 2050, but it will be packing all those people into an area only slightly larger than Texas.

Second, Nigeria is more or less evenly split between Muslims, mostly in the northern half of the country, and Christians in the centre and south, but per-capita income in the north is only half that in the south.

The election of Buhari, a Muslim from the north, restores the traditional alternation of Christians and Muslims in the presidency, but that deal is unlikely to last much longer because the northern birth rate is far higher than in the south.

Third, the poverty and over-population of the north has been an excellent incubator for extremism, and an Islamist cult called Boko Haram has now seized control of much of the northeast. At least 13 000 people have been killed in the ongoing violence since 2009, and 1,5 million have been displaced. Boko Haram now swears allegiance to the “caliph” of the “Islamic State” (Isis) in the Middle East, and competes with it in cruelty.

Oh, and the price of oil, the main source of government revenue, is down by half.

Buhari may be a reformed character, and he will certainly do much more than Goodluck Jonathan on the anti-corruption front. (He could hardly do less.)

But all these other problems will continue to undermine Nigeria’s stability and prosperity even if he manages to eliminate the worst of the corruption.

On the other hand, it could be a lot worse.

As Wole Soyinka, the celebrated author who has become Nigeria’s public conscience, told The Guardian on Tuesday, “Unambiguously it is good that the Jonathan government has been removed. It was impossible. Even a plunge into the unknown was preferable to what was going on. We were drowning.”.

Dyer is a London-based independent journalist.

Recent Posts

Stories you will enjoy

Recommended reading