WASHINGTON â€” President-elect Barack Obamaâ€™s economic recovery plan ran into crossfire from his own party in Congress on Thursday, suggesting that quick passage of spending programs and tax cuts could require more time and negotiation than Democrats once hoped.
Senate Democrats complained that major components of his plan were not bold enough and urged more focus on creating jobs and rebuilding the nationâ€™s energy infrastructure rather than cutting taxes.
Just hours earlier, Mr. Obama called for speedy passage of the stimulus measure, warning that the recession â€œcould linger for yearsâ€ if Congress did not pass his plan within weeks.
Further complicating the picture, Democratic senators said Thursday that they would try to attach legislation to the package that would allow bankruptcy courts to modify home loans, a move Republicans have opposed.
Parallel to its work on the stimulus plan, the Obama team has also been considering how to use the second $350 billion of the bailout program approved by Congress. A transition team official said Thursday night that the new approach would give government officials broader range to provide relief on consumer loans for homes, automobiles and education, while also doing more to address foreclosures and the problems of municipalities and small businesses.
For his recovery plan, meanwhile, Mr. Obama has been assembling a package worth as much as $775 billion over two years to revive the sagging economy, using the plan to define his presidency even before it begins and to foreshadow his broader approach to governing.
While relying on traditionally liberal notions of using government spending to spur growth, he has also tried to adapt it for a new era with investment in clean energy and technology. And he is trying to balance all of that with tax breaks that appeal to Republicans.
But the broad support he has enjoyed so far for the basic concept is now being tested as the specifics become clearer. While conservatives criticize the high spending, and moderate Democrats express concern about the swelling deficit, liberals are pushing for even more money devoted to social programs, alternative-energy development and road, bridge and school construction.
David Axelrod, Mr. Obamaâ€™s senior adviser, said the president-electâ€™s team was not concerned by the emerging pockets of criticism of his plan.
â€œObviously, itâ€™s a big answer to a big problem and there are a lot of component parts to it,â€ Mr. Axelrod said in an interview after meeting with balky Senate Democrats. â€œThese folks are not potted plants. Theyâ€™re elected officials, and theyâ€™re doing their jobs.â€
He added, â€œItâ€™s a collective process, and weâ€™re willing to listen to peopleâ€™s ideas.â€
Asked if they were willing to adopt peopleâ€™s ideas, Mr. Axelrod said: â€œWeâ€™ll see. It depends on the idea.â€
Mr. Axelrodâ€™s comments came after a spirited meeting at the Capitol where he and two other Obama aides, Lawrence H. Summers, the incoming national economic adviser, and Philip Schiliro, tapped to be the chief White House lobbyist, heard lots of frustration from Democratic senators.
â€œThere is only one thing we have got to do in the stimulus, and that is how can we create jobs,â€ said Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, as he left the meeting. â€œI am a little concerned by the way that Mr. Summers and others are going at this in that, to me, it still looks like a little more of this trickle-down, if we just put it in at the top, itâ€™s going to trickle down. A number of people in there said, â€˜Look, we have got to have programs that actually create jobs and put people to work.â€™ â€
Senator Kent Conrad, Democrat of North Dakota and chairman of the Budget Committee, said lawmakers and the incoming administration had differences over how to focus the huge federal spending in a recovery bill. â€œInvestment, investment, investment has got to be the central focus: energy, roads, bridges, waterways, housing,â€ he said. â€œJob creation is Job One.â€
Mr. Conrad, who described the meeting as extremely positive, said Mr. Summers ended it by telling the senators, â€œMessage received, loud and clear.â€
Several Democrats on the Finance Committee earlier in the day questioned the proposal to give tax credits worth $500 to individuals and $1,000 to married couples. Several senators said that initiative would provide a token sum of money, which taxpayers were likely to save, not spend.
Senator John F. Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, and others also criticized a proposal to give businesses a $3,000 tax credit for each new employee they hire, saying it was unlikely to influence business decisions.