WE, the members of the Zimbabwe Catholic Bishops Conference, issued a press statement on June 2, in regard to the “clean-up” operation dubbed “Operation Restore Order” in which we expressed our dismay at the suffering and hardship experie
nced by the most vulnerable members of society in some areas nationwide.
Now, almost four weeks after the event started, countless numbers of men, women with babies, children of school age, the old and the sick, continue to sleep in the open air at winter temperatures near to freezing. These people urgently need shelter, food, clothing and medicines, among others.
Any claim to justify this operation in view of a desired orderly end becomes
totally groundless in view of the cruel and inhumane means that have been used. People have a right to shelter and that has been deliberately destroyed in this operation without much warning.
While we all desire orderliness, alternative accommodation and sources of income should have been identified and provided before the demolitions and stoppage of informal trading.
We condemn the gross injustice done to the poor. As a follow-up to our press statement, we wish to offer a pastoral reflection on recent events based on Scripture and social teaching of the church.
In the gospel of June 5, while these events were taking place, Jesus tells us: “What I want is mercy, not sacrifice’ (Mt 9:13). His words reflect those of the Old Testament prophets who continually state that prayers and sacrifices are of no value unless there is concern for the poor and needy (Amos 5:1-4).
There has been no concern for the poor and needy in this operation and the prayers and offerings of those responsible find no favour before God.
The prophet Isaiah reminds us “to share our bread with the hungry, to shelter the homeless poor and to clothe the man seen to be naked” …(Is. 58:5-7).
The entire ministry of Jesus is marked by concern for the weak and vulnerable.
Jesus tells us that we will be judged at the end of time on whether we have shared this concern, and he has terrible words to say to those who saw him hungry, thirsty, a stranger, or naked, or sick (or homeless…) and neglected to help him (Mt 25:42 -46).
As Christians we must hear the cry of the poor and the homeless in our townships and villages and support them in their efforts to gradually rebuild their lives. In this task we should be motivated and guided by the social teaching of the Church.
The social teaching of the church sheds the light of the gospel on issues that affect our lives in society, and offers the church’s wisdom, insight and experience in dealing with them. This teaching, based on scripture, has developed over more than a hundred years, and is mainly found in Papal letters and documents emanating from Synods and conferences of bishops.
It contains a number of principles which are particularly relevant at this time:
*Dignity of the human person. Created in the image and likeness of God (Gen 1:26-27), each person has an innate human dignity, given to us, not by secular authorities, but by the Creator himself. This dignity was gravely violated by the ruthless manner in which “Operation Restore Order” was conducted in the townships and other areas.
Every violation of the personal dignity of the human being cries out for vengeance to God and is an offence against the Creator of the individual (Christifideles Laici, 37 – Pope John Paul 11);
*Basic rights. Basic human rights are an offshoot of our God-given dignity. Every human being – man, woman and child – has the right to life, shelter, clothing, food, education, health care, employment, etc. These basic rights have been and are being violated. No secular authority, no group, or no individual should be allowed to violate such rights.
As Christian leaders we must continually remind authorities of both their duty to respect and uphold human rights, and of the serious consequences of failure to observe such rights. Furthermore, it is our duty as a teaching church to form and educate Christian people in rights, values and principles – a task that we will continue to perform;
*Promotion of common good. Public authorities should promote the common good of all members of society – not the good of an elite group – by creating an environment in which economic, social, cultural and political life can flourish.
In such an environment, all citizens – including those who have lost their homes and livelihoods – can have access to the goods of the earth which are intended by God to be equally shared. The promotion of the common good should be the first priority of public policy, not the promotion of party political aims.
“It is the proper function of authority to arbitrate, in the name of the common good, between various particular interests; but it should make accessible to each what is needed to lead a truly human life: food, clothing, health, work, education and culture, suitable information, the right to establish a family, and so on,” (Catechism of the Catholic church, 1992, par 1909).
In the order of things, people always come first and cannot be subservient to an economy, a political agenda or an ideology for that matter;
*Option for the poor. In the application of the principle of the common good, some people remain poor and marginalised. The church must show particular concern for them. The moral test of a society is how it treats its most vulnerable members.
As Christians we must continue to examine public policy decisions, including policies related to housing, healthcare and food security, in terms of how they affect the poor, and bow our heads in shame at the nation-wide operation that has greatly increased poverty and destitution in all areas.
The interference with informal trading, which supports formal trading, can only accelerate our economic decline. The option for the poor, most of whom are informal traders, is an essential part of society’s effort to achieve the common good of all its members. To the church, the poor are a treasure (St Laurence, in Butler, Lives of the Saints, August 10);
*Subsidiarity. The principle of subsidiarity refers to passing powers downward from the top to the grassroots, or as close to the grassroots as possible. The principle implies a preference for local over central decision-making.
Central authority should support local authority efforts and only undertake those tasks which local bodies cannot achieve. If there is a “clean-up” required on our streets or if there is a problem of criminality in the townships, it is essentially the task of local authorities – including community/residents associations and church bodies – supported by the police and the courts, to deal with these problems. This should take place in an orderly process over a period of time, and in a way that promotes and preserves human dignity, people’s rights and the common good.
As always, our prayer for you is peace be with you.
*Mt Rev Robert C Ndlovu of Harare;
*Mt Rev Pius Alec M Ncube of Bulawayo;
*Rt Rev Michael D Bhasera of Masvingo (president);
*Rt Rev Alexio Churu Muchabaiwa of Mutare;
*Rt Rev Angel Floro of Gokwe;
*Rt Rev Patrick M Mutume, Auxiliary Bishop of Mutare